Crossroads: Using Pesticides Wisely By A. R. Chase and Mike Zemke

Using insecticides/fungicides/miticides/herbicides wisely will save on costs of crop production. When it comes time to use one of these products and you find yourself at a crossroad, what are you going to do?

Insecticides, fungicides, miticides, herbicides … fungicides, insecticides, herbicides, miticides. All different uses, all different labels. Wow, what an expensive inventory you need. Managing and applying your pesticides is a huge undertaking. What to apply, when to apply, rotate with this or with that, tank mix this with that. My head spins, and as most of you know I’m not a plant person, so my hat is off to you. And this is only one of the areas of expertise you are expected to understand.

I might not be a plant person, but I do understand cost. So when it comes time to use one of these products and you find yourself at a crossroad, what are you going to do? Using insecticides/fungicides/miticides/herbicides wisely will save on costs of crop production. If you find something going on, the first step is to get a diagnosis and the second step is to find out what you need to use. It seems fairly simple and, if you are not a grower, not that hard.

If you do not feel like getting a diagnosis and think you know what the problem is, go ahead and “shoot from the hip.” Then see just how much product you’ve wasted, time you’ve lost (time is money) and now you are even further behind.

Figure 1: “Wise” vs. “unwise” approaches to disease management.

Using pesticides wisely not only saves a lot of money, but your plants will most likely be better also. Many of you know about and have used our “Guide to Ornamental Fungicides” with Syngenta. This quick guide will tell you if a fungicide will even work on a specific disease — no guessing! If you don’t have one … let us know.

When Ann (A.R.) was asked to address this topic, she came up with the following list of “wise” vs. “unwise” approaches to disease management (Figure 1).

Do not use a product with low efficacy or apply products too often or at excessive rates. In a recent study on powdery mildew, better control was achieved when a very effective product was used on a long interval rather than alternating the effective product with a “green” product. The result was more disease when the products were alternated — probably due to the added water from the intermediate treatment with the low efficacy product.

Similar research has shown that using excellent fungicides for downy mildew more than twice a week can end up making the downy mildew explode. This is probably due to the added water in the sprays which dramatically favors downy mildew disease.

In yet another case, using a higher rate of fosetyl aluminum actually gives less control of downy mildew than the lower labeled rates. We have seen the same thing happen with many other products when using too high a rate. Applying a copper product for control of Botrytis is often counter-productive as it an cause phytotoxicity, leading to worse Botrytis.

Finally, we worked with an orchid grower who was using three fungicides at very low rates in a weekly tank-mix to control Fusarium. Losses were up to 2 percent per week. We suggested using the right rate of two of the products (much higher) on a 21-day interval. The grower tried it and within two months saw a drop in weekly loss to less than 0.1 percent. In addition, their fungicide costs were cut in half.

Each of these situations led to worse disease, which is clearly not the goal. Remember that environment always trumps chemical control so there are times when no fungicide treatment is the best approach if the culture of the crop cannot be corrected to favor the crop over the disease. Spraying is not always the answer to a disease outbreak. Stop and think!



Chase Agricultural Consulting, LLC was formed at the end of 2011 when Ann (A.R.) Chase and Mike Zemke moved to Arizona. Ann has more than 35 years experience in research, diagnostics and practical consulting in plant pathology. She has been retired from the University of Florida – Mid Florida Research and Education Center in Apopka since 1994, but remains on staff as a Professor Emeritus. Mike holds an Associate of Applied Science in manufacturing drafting. Mike started his education in horticulture when he and Ann were married in 1995. He specializes in communications of all sorts within the industry.



Latest Photos see all »

GPN recognizes 40 industry professionals under the age of 40 who are helping to determine the future of the horticulture industry. These individuals are today’s movers and shakers who are already setting the pace for tomorrow.
Kait Barry
Susan Judd
Alex Kantor
Liz Hughes
Andrew Konicki
Kit Leider Pierri
Lauren Kirchner
Michelle Opela
Judson LeCompte

GPN January 2022 cover
Get one year of Greenhouse Product News in both print and digital editions for free.


Interested in reading the print edition of GPN?

Subscribe Today »



Be sure to check
out our sister site.
website development by deyo designs